Saturday, 8 August 2015

The Church must ERADICATE and BURN, and CAST AWAY ALL Roots of the Abortion Movement. NOW!!!!

Many people are finally just starting to wake up to the evils of abortion. Many think that the defunding of the child-murder centre, Planned Parenthood is a victory in itself which will inevitably lead to the abolition of abortion. However, defunding Planned Parenthood is like chopping of the bad fruit from a bad tree. The (bad) fruit will grow again where the roots not eradicated and cast away to be burnt up in flames. Thus, it is absolutely crucial for all abolitionists to identify the roots of the child-murder movement, eradicate them and cast them into the fire.

The doctrines of “rights” in the west

The doctrine of ‘rights’ which was embraced by the west during the Enlightenment Era lays the ideological foundation for the child-murder movement.  The Enlightenment Era signified a total break from Christendom: it was a rebellion and backlash against the Church. One doctrine commonly accepted by the masses during the Enlightenment was that of rights, a doctrine of the spirit of individualism, humanism and liberalism.

The doctrine of “rights” is anti-Christian

The doctrine of ‘rights’ is a fleshly, carnal and worldly one which has absolutely no place in the life of the Christian. It implies that human beings deserve things. However, the Bible makes it very clear that none of us deserve anything from God at all whatsoever, not even a single breath. God in His Sovereignty does not even need to create us as He is the potter and we are the clay.  

God owes us nothing at all, absolutely and everything good that He gives to us, is by His grace and grace alone. It is not by grace and some dignity, kindness or love that any of us deserve that He gives us life. No, it is only by grace that God gives us life. To claim that there is such thing as a “right” is to not only contend with God’s Sovereignty, but to usurp it. The doctrine of “rights” is blasphemy and a damnable heresy. Anyone who believes in “rights”, whether it be her own or that of another, will burn in Hell.

None of us deserve to live for all of us deserve to die and burn in Hell for an Eternity. For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). The wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). It is plain and clear. Thus, there is no such thing as a “right” to life as the pro-lifers claim.

A Call to Repentance

Any abolitionist who claims that there is such thing as a “right” to life needs to repent. Such a doctrine is a wicked, blasphemous one that will not only taint the abolitionist movement –  it will sow seeds of destruction, seeds that the devil plants in undiscerning, immature Christians like the Christians in the Church of Corinth who Apostle Paul had to address because of their carnality.

You may still argue that it is because of God’s grace and gift of life that He gives to each of us that we have the “right” to life. You may defiantly and even, in your hostility against those who claim that there is no such thing as a “right”, insist that you will continue to fight for the “rights” of the unborn. Claiming a “right” is always that of a spirit of self-centred, thinking that one is owed something by another because one “deserves” it. There are only moral obligations on part of all humans, but no rights whatsoever.

It is absolutely wrong to murder, and he who murders another person will die in Hell (Revelation 21:8). However, it is not because the murdered person has any right to live whatsoever that he will go to Hell. Rather, it is because murder offends God, not the victim that the murderer will go to Hell.  

Sin is defined only by God and not any human being

Sin is anything that offends God, and it is that it offends God that makes it sin. That sin might offend, harm or hurt another human has absolutely no bearing on its wrongness. To argue that sin is a sin because it hurts, or harms another human, or because it offends God and hurts another human is itself of a manner of spirit which is self-centred, self-preserving and to challenge the authority of God as the only One who defines truth, and based on that truth, what is sin.  For He is the Great I AM (Exodus 3:14). God and God alone defines Truth, for Christ who is God in the flesh said, “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life” (John 14:6).

The claim that an action is sin because it offends or can offend another human, or because it offends both God and humans, is a damnable heresy. This does not only shamefully elevate humans to a wrongful position, but it itself a claim that is it not Christ alone who defines truth, but rather that truth can be defined by humans as well. It is an abominable heresy! It is an attack on the very character of Christ. This is because sin is defined by Truth, and Christ and Christ alone is the truth.

“Rights” provides the common ground between pro-choicers and pro-lifers

It is not only those feminists who claim that they have a “right” to control their own bodies who are responsible for the genocide of unborn children. Those from the pro-life movement who propagate the doctrine of “rights”, specially the “right” to life are also responsible, all without realising how dangerous the doctrine of “rights”. It is precisely this blasphemous, self-worshipping, human-centred, fleshly doctrine that logically leads the pro-lifer to support exceptions to the prohibition of abortion, such in the case of rape, incest or where the mother’s health is endangered.

The doctrine of “rights” itself leads to the slippery slope of needing to ‘balance’ the “rights” of the mother to life, and the “rights” of the baby to life.  In fact, this is precisely why some, if not many, pro-choicers are pro-abortion: to enable a balancing of the “right” to life of both the mother and baby where there is a ‘hard’ case.

One might still argue that the pro-lifer believes in saving the lives of both. That may be true, however, that the pro-lifer seeks to do so is not the issue. The issue is that the pro-life builds its faulty foundation on “rights”. That is why it has not been successful, not can be successful in abolishing abortion. As long as one seeks to argue against baby-murder on grounds not based on the Truth of the Word of God, such as the “right to life”, one cannot abolish the sin it is seeking to fight. Evil cannot be fought by evil.

If one argues for the “right to life”, it logically follows that must also consider that of all parties involved, that is both the baby and mother. This is where there no difference between the pro-lifer and pro-choicer who are both seeking to save the lives of people on the grounds of “rights”. The only difference between the two is the label.

The doctrine of “rights” makes the issue of abortion, one of a matter of choosing whose rights trump over the other. That is precisely the conundrum it sets up, as a result of not being based on the foundation of God’s Word. As such, the pro-life movement is like a house built on the sand, destroyed when the winds of competing “rights” arguments come, such as “right” of a mother to care for her other children, or “right” to material comfort.

That is why the Church, and not the pro-lifers, should rise up against child-murder and all other sins that society accepts, preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and teach the nations to walk in His Commandments:

 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen (Matthew 28:19-20).
As long as the Church seeks rely on the Rock of Christ, the gates of Hell shall not prevail (Matthew 16:17-19).

Church, repent of accepting the evil doctrine of “rights”, flush it out of your system, and preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ!