Modern western society claims value equality and justice.
However, its acceptance of abortion as a right calls this into question. It is full
of hypocrisy, especially as evidenced by its claim to hatred of paedophilia,
but support of abortion. Such hypocrisy remains unnoticed because hypocrisy had
a blinding effect on those who are blinded by hypocrisy.
Abortion is redefined as a convenience or a choice. Abortion-on-demand
(or child sacrifice on demand) is now seen as a right, a sacred right. Abortion
and infanticide are one and the same as both involving killing a child.
Abortion kills an unborn child, while infanticide kills a born child. They are both
child sacrifice. Thus, the distinction between an unborn person and a person
who has been born is absolutely irrelevant. A life is sacrificed for another’s
comfort, convenience or career.
However, abortion and infanticide are in no way unique to
the modern world. Abortion and infanticide have been practiced in the ancient world
as rituals, which parallel that in the modern world where abortion and
infanticide are practiced regularly, like a ritual in the ancient pagan
religions as an offering to pagan gods.
The Perpetuating evil
of Abortion
Indeed, nothing is new under the sun. Every age has its
evils and evils are merely repackaged. The blood of the unborn is on the hands
of all who actively support, participate in or complicity in abortion. The
blood of the unborn cries out for justice. Yes, justice. Abortion is an act of
bloodlust for abortion is an act of violence, violence against an innocent
child who cannot speak up for him or herself.
The acceptance of abortion as a ‘right’ is indicative of a sexually
perverse and self-centred society, one that only cares for its own comfort, convenience
and careers. Children are sacrificed to enjoy these things. Even the term ‘abortion’
is one that masks the real evil that it is, under the guise of a medical
procedure and any questioning of this term is treated with scorn because all
people know that abortion is murder.
Child sacrifice in
the Ancient World
Children as curses
Child sacrifice was a ritual in ancient pagan religions such
as those of the Carthaginians and Caananites. Diodorus Siculus describes in The Library of History Book 20 Chapter 14 the child sacrifice that was made to
pagan gods to appease their ‘wrath’:
Therefore the Carthaginians, believing
that the misfortune had come to them from the gods, betook themselves to every
manner of supplication of the divine powers; and, because they believed that
Heracles, who was worshipped in their mother city,29 was exceedingly angry with them,
they sent a large sum of money and many of the most expensive offerings to
Tyre. 2 Since they had come as colonists from that
city, it had been their custom in the earlier p179period to send to the
god a tenth of all that was paid into the public revenue; but later, when they
had acquired great wealth and were receiving more considerable revenues, they
sent very little indeed, holding the divinity of little account. But turning to
repentance because of this misfortune, they bethought them of all the gods of
Tyre. 3 They even sent from their temples in
supplication the golden shrines with their images,30 believing that they would better
appease the wrath of the god if the offerings were sent for the sake of winning
forgiveness. 4 They also alleged that Cronus31 had turned against them inasmuch
as in former times they had been accustomed to sacrifice to this god the
noblest of their sons, but more recently, secretly buying and nurturing
children, they had sent these to the sacrifice; and when an investigation was
made, some of those who had been sacrificed were discovered to have been
supposititious. 5 When they had given thought to
these things and saw their enemy encamped before their walls, they were filled
with superstitious dread, for they believed that they had neglected the honours
of the gods that had been established by their fathers. In their zeal to make
amends for their omission, they selected two hundred of the noblest children
and sacrificed them publicly; and others who were under suspicion sacrificed
themselves voluntarily, in number not less than three hundred. 6 There was in their city a bronze image of Cronus,
extending its hands, palms up and sloping toward the ground, so that each of
the children when placed p181thereon rolled down and fell into a sort of
gaping pit filled with fire. It is probable that it was from this that
Euripides has drawn the mythical story found in his works about the sacrifice
in Tauris, in which he presents Iphigeneia being asked by Orestes:
But what tomb shall receive me when
I die?
A sacred fire within, and earth's broad
rift.32
|
Also the story passed down among the Greeks from ancient
myth that Cronus did away with his own children appears to have been kept in
mind among the Carthaginians through this observance.
The Carthaginians believed
that the lack of wealth was a ‘misfortune’ which indicated the wrath of the
pagan gods against them. As such, children, who they perceived to a burden to
their quest for wealth, were murdered to appease the pagan gods. Such was the “solution”
to the lack of wealth: the murder of children. Children were deemed a curse to
the gods they worshipped.
Ritual Child
Sacrifice to Bring about Prosperity and Abundance
The Carthanginians,
like other groups which worshipped pagan gods and practiced child sacrifice to
appease them had a common theme. They worshipped nature and practiced fertility
rites. The sacrifice
of humans was to bring about prosperity to nature because humans represented
that which ‘Mother Nature’ provided:
Aztec hymns
tell us that Tonacacihuatl, Our Lady of Substance, was once the Goddess of the
Hunt, Blood and Night, but as the people grew to depend more on agriculture,
She evolved into the Earth Goddess. The son of Her fertility was the corn,
which was depicted as being identical with the obsidian knife which was Her
symbol. These were the phallic representations of Xipe, the young god
identified with the corn and the sunlight, both of which grew up and increased
to maturity from the depths of the dark earth.
Here, too, fertility, death and sacrifice are connected. The
husking of the corn is perceived as the same act as the tearing out of a
sacrificial victim's heart, both accomplished with the obsidian blade. At the
celebration of the broom harvest of the Earth Mother, first an older woman, and
then a young girl were beheaded and their blood spread on fruit, seeds and
grain to guarantee abundance.
At the autumn equinox
purification feast of the ancient Incas of Peru, families first bathed and then
anointed their bodies with a substance called zancus which was made from grain mixed with human blood. It was also
applied to the thresholds of their homes as a protective charm. The Indians of
Guayaquil, Ecuador, used to sow their fields with blood and human hearts to assure
the harvest. And the Bagobos of Mindanao in the Philippines offered human
sacrifices when sowing the rice fields. The Bontoc and the Apoyaos of the
interior of Luzon, also in the Philippines, hunted human heads to be offered at
both planting and harvest times.
The sacrificial victim was meant to be an embodiment of the grain,
and was chosen because of some obvious resemblance to it. For example, the
Aztecs would kill young victims to represent young corn and mature ones to
stand for the ripe. The Marimos of South Africa would choose a short, fat man,
round as a seed. The Skidi Pawnees of North America would fatten their female
victim before the kill to assure an abundant crop of plump corn.
The worship of nature involving
sacrifice of humans parallels that of the modern environmentalist movement
which constantly expresses anxiety over overpopulation. The environmentalist
movement has roots that deifies nature, believing the Earth to be a real being
called ‘Gaia’. The Gaia Hypothesis was purported that the Earth is a
self-regulating system itself (or deity) that contributes to maintaining the
conditions of life on Earth. This belief lead to the climate change alarmism which
feared a lack of resources to sustain life on Earth for all humans. Overpopulation
is the modern equivalent to the perceived threat to wealth to be enjoyed by the
Carthaginians, and the systematic murder of humans through euthanasia and
abortion are believed by some to be the solution.
Infanticide in Ancient Rome
Children were deemed a curse by those
who practiced the ancient pagan religions. The pagan religion of the Roman
Empire was no different. Childlessness and singleness were status symbols that
represented power in Ancient Rome. Not
only did childlessness and singles represented how economically independent a
person was. It indicated how ‘liberated’ and accomplished a person was Tacitus
in Annals of Rome Book III describes ancient
Roman culture to be one which ethic was that of doing as the individual
chooses:
Mankind in the earliest age lived for a time
without a single vicious impulse, without shame or guilt, and,
consequently, without punishment and restraints. Rewards were not needed when everything
right was pursued on its own merits; and as men desired nothing
against morality, they were debarred from nothing by fear. When however
they began to throw off equality, and ambition and violence usurped the place
of self-control and modesty, despotisms grew up and became perpetual among
many nations. Some from the beginning, or when tired of kings, preferred
codes of laws. These were at first simple, while men's minds were
unsophisticated. The most famous of them were those of the Cretans, framed by
Minos; those of the Spartans, by Lycurgus, and, subsequently, those which
Solan drew up for the Athenians on a more elaborate and extensive scale.
Romulus governed us as he pleased; then Numa united our people by religious ties
and a constitution of divine origin, to which some additions were made by
Tullus and Ancus. But Servius Tullius was our chief legislator, to whose
laws even kings were to be subject.
There
was no regard for equity and fairness. The rule was not only to do as one
chooses, but that anyone who did not do as one chooses was deemed naive,
immature and unsophisticated. Ambition and violence was the ethic of the
ancient Roman culture. As such it was no coincidence that infanticide was
rampant and normal. Infanticide is the epitome of violence. It was so rampant
that the Rome became known as the ‘childless state’ which Tacitus attributed
to Rome’s vices of sexual perversion and infanticide:
It was next proposed to relax the Papia
Poppaea law, which Augustus in his old age had passed subsequently to the
Julian statutes, for yet further enforcing the penalties on celibacy
and for enriching the exchequer. And yet, marriages and the rearing of
children did not become more frequent, so
powerful were the attractions of a childless state. Meanwhile there was
an increase in the number of persons imperilled, for every household was
undermined by the insinuations of informers; and now the country suffered from
its laws, as it had hitherto suffered from its vices. This suggests to
me a fuller discussion of the origin of law and of the methods by which we
have arrived at the present endless multiplicity and variety of our statutes.
The
treatment of children as a burden by ancient pagan cultures is akin to the way
modern society treats children – chattel whose parents decided whether they
should live or die. Modern society, by even for a moment believing that parents
can decide whether another person, namely a child, should live is acceptable.
This is no different from ancient pagan cultures. Yet, modern society dares
think itself better than ancient cultures.
Child sacrifice in the Modern World
The fear of overpopulation leading lack of resources, lack
of comfort and convenience or a lack of produce for the year are the anxieties
that have led to the legitimisation of child sacrifice. Many people in modern
society think they are far too upright and decent to support child sacrifice.
While many may think they believe child sacrifice is abominable, they are all
too happy to justify child sacrifice where it hinders the comfort of their
parents. Many think that they would never support child abuse while yet being
all too happy to justify child sacrifice. Such is the hypocrisy of the modern society.
Child sacrifice is the very epitome of child abuse.
Since many people do not want to admit to themselves that
they truly support child sacrifice, they are quick to raise the question about
abortion in the cases of rape and incest. Even doubting these exceptions, while
acknowledging such tragedies to be tragic, is enough to cause incendiary
reactions. The deceptive cunning question that people ask regarding abortion is
‘what about the health of the woman?’ Health is one issue, while child
sacrifice is another. The health of the woman is made an issue regarding child
sacrifice to disguise what abortion really is, and also to justify this
diabolical practice. Majority of people think that child sacrifice is
justifiable. This indicates that majority of people are blinded to what child
sacrifice really is – the diabolical evil that it is. Such is the ideology of abortionism.
Abortionism: The
Worship of Child Sacrifice
Abortionism is an ideology centred on abortion as a
political, social and cultural issue. Its tenets are that abortion is not an
absolute good or evil, and that it for the individual to decide for oneself
whether one should procure an abortion. As such, abortion is accepted by those
influenced by abortionism as a right to choose. It is embraced by people who are
involved in sexual perversions such as incest, rape, fornication and adultery because
it legitimises their ability to do such things.
It has been said that “abortion is the irresponsible man’s
best friend”. Indeed, abortion legitimises the sexual perversions of
fornicating adulterous men, who take their girlfriends to child sacrifice
centres, called ‘abortion clinics’ to free themselves of responsibility for a
child that is born unto him. The catchphrase should replace the word
‘irresponsible’ with the phrase ‘fornicating and adulterous’. Child sacrifice
does not justify “irresponsibility”. Rather, it justifies (serial) fornication
and adultery of both men and women. It is precisely for this reason that abortion
was pushed to be legalised during the ‘sexual revolution’ of the 1960s.
Abortionism as the
New Secular Religion
Although child sacrifice in the modern world may not be
performed to appease pagan gods, the modern ideology of abortionism it is
parallel to the ancient pagan religions. The child sacrifice is now called
‘abortion’. The push for sexual freedom is done to appease the ‘god’ of sexual
lusts. The abortionism movement has its leaders who devote their entire lives
to fighting for ‘abortion rights’, the modern equivalent to the priests of the
ancient pagan religions who would throw a child into the fire of Molech, the pagan
god of child sacrifice. Entire books are written solely to inform ‘abortive’ parents
about the risks and benefits of abortion to help them make “informed choices”,
so as to give a veneer of care and compassion, when the true motive is to
create deceitful propaganda which seeks to promote abortion as a moral good. This
is the hypocrisy of the movement, claiming to care for others, when one has a
heart full of hate and murder. It is no
different from religious hypocrisy.
It also often has a vehement, vicious and, unsurprisingly,
violent hatred of those who are opposed to child sacrifice. If not, it is
cynical towards those who speak out for the unborn children. Anyone who even dares
to cast doubt on the ethics and morality of abortion is deemed an evil heretic
who needs to be unquestionably silenced; the modern equivalent of burning a
person at the stake on the mere grounds of just suspecting the person to be guilty of witchcraft. Anyone who even dares
question abortion is just lectured to be “careful” to not “offend” others (as
if offending people because of their immoral thinking should even be taken into
consideration), or to be “moderate” in one’s views. Abortion is indeed treated
as a sacred right in the modern world.
That the mere questioning of the ethics and morality of
abortion, which all people know to be child sacrifice, is scorned indicates how
so many are dominated by the fear of losing child sacrifice as a ‘right’. So
many are dominated by this fear because they perceive the absence of access to
child sacrifice as a threat to their material comfort, sexual licentiousness
which they so dearly love, and threats to ‘Mother Earth’ who they believe will
revenge simply because more children are born.
The Flaws of “Pro-life”
movement
The pro-life movement is one that appears to be fighting
abortion, but it built on has a sandy foundation. It is one that does not seek
to uncompromisingly eradicate abortion for what abortion is in and of itself –
murder of a human. Rather, it seeks to fight abortion solely on the grounds of
the possible negative consequences; namely that babies will have no ‘rights’, women
will be hurt and families will be broken down.
While one should care for the pain and hurt of others, the
real issue as to why abortion should be abolished is that abortion itself is
evil; child sacrifice, that is, murder. It fights abortion from a
consequentialistic, humanistic framework under a compassionate, caring guise. While
it most of its members are truly against abortion for being the evil it is, it practically
treats abortion as wrong solely on the grounds of the negative consequences,
rather than because it is the act of murder in and of itself. This is
especially evident in its support for its incrementalism.
The Consequentialistic Ethic of the pro-life movement
A leading figure of the pro-life movement Cassy Fiano in her
article titled ‘Does Sympathy for Abortive Women weaken the
pro-life cause?’ reveals the
underlying thinking of the movement. She cunningly manipulates an article written by an abortion
abolitionist which critiques the pro-life movement for being ‘sympathetic’
towards women who have had abortions, murderers, and deliberately cunningly
cuts off the part about what the real issue of abortion is: systematic child
sacrifice. Her motive is to portray abolitionism as a hateful rhetoric. She
then concludes saying: “If
this is how the pro-life movement has to move forward in order to succeed, then
we might as well just pack it up and go home, and let the abortion industry
declare victory.”
Fiano
misses the real point of the article. The real issue is that abortion is murder
itself, just as paedophilia itself is evil. Should an anti-paedophilia group
say to proponents of paedophilia, “You victims need help with carrying out safe
child-adult relationships?” No. Paedophilia is to be treated an evil in and of
itself, and the people who practice it are not “mentally evil” but depraved and
wicked. Likewise, those who procure or perform abortions are not “mentally
evil” but depraved and wicked. It is for this reason that the pro-life movement
is flawed from its foundation. It does not treat abortion as murder and all the
people involved in procuring, performing and promoting abortions as guilty of
murder. It is based on the weak foundations of the consequentialistic
humanistic ethic.
She
gives the pro-life stereotypes of ‘abortive’ women, based on her own personal
assumptions to produce an emotional construct as to stir up sympathy for those
who murder their children:
According to the CDC, most women who have abortions are in
their early twenties. They are almost all unmarried. She is not likely to be a cheerleader
for abortion, enthusiastically signing up to murder her unborn child because
she is a heartless witch. She is someone who almost surely feels that she has
no choice, that it’s either her life or her baby’s. She goes to an abortion
clinic, probably Planned Parenthood, where
she’s given false information and manipulated into have the abortion.
If she
isn’t being outright coerced by her partner or her family, then there’s a very
good chance she’s under an extraordinary amount of pressure to have the
abortion done. And the abortion clinic isn’t going to tell her about all of the
organizations that exist that will gladly help her with keeping her baby, or
that will facilitate an adoption, even an adoption that will allow her to still
be in her baby’s life.
She
then goes on to give her individualistic humanistic rhetoric, which provides no
moral grounds on absolute terms as to why one should care. Rather, she seeks to
compromise with the pro-abortionists, fearing that such “hateful” (that is,
truthful) words could “hurt” the movement:
As pro-lifers, we should be there to
welcome her. But if we’re snarling at her that she’s a murderer, or a potential
murderer, then why on earth would
she trust us to help her? To find healing? Many women who have abortions suffer
from guilt and regret.
They’re more likely to be depressed and suicidal after an abortion. The last thing they need is to come
to so-called pro-lifers seeking help, only to find judgment and shame.
Far from weakening the pro-life cause,
compassion and sympathy for post-abortive women strengthens us all. This kind
of thinking is something that should never be associated with the pro-life
movement. We become caricatures of evil, hateful lunatics who embody every
negative stereotype that abortion activists paint of us.
Fiano mixes truth alongside with lies. While it must be
acknowledged that most women who obtained abortions are unsupported and fed
lies by the largest abortuary Planned Parenthood, the women who obtain abortions
do know exactly what they are doing and do so on their own volition. Anyone who
murders another human being should be guilty and ashamed. Thus, people who
“suffer” from guilt and shame cannot be said to “deserving” of sympathy as
something earned for all have a moral obligation in the first place to not
murder. This includes abortionists and those who procure abortions for
themselves or other people.
Compromising approach of the pro-life movement
The pro-life movement is one that merely seeks to set
standards for safer abortion clinics, better birth control, greater
restrictions on abortions, greater accountability of the partners of abortive
women, and lower the number of abortions performed. These can be all used to
justify child sacrifice on the other hand through regulation of abortion,
rather than its total abolition. This leads to compromise with evil, under the
guise of being “caring”, “sensitive” and “compassionate”.
The pro-life movement falsely portrays women who practice
child sacrifice as deserving of sympathy as though they were victimised by
abortion. Such is the naivete and compromising attitude of the pro-life
movement. Hence, this explains why the
pro-life movement focuses on the ‘abuse’ of women through volitional abortions
because it can be used to abandon her with children. Although abortion can
certainly be used as a tool by men to abandon a sexual partner and find other
women to fornicate with, this is not the reason why child sacrifice is wrong.
It is also ironic that pro-lifers do not ever acknowledge how abortion can be
used by women against their husbands or boyfriends as an emotional or
psychological attack. This is a very common incidence and there are some women
who deliberately seek to fall pregnant for the purpose of child sacrifice.
The pro-life movement is often biased towards women and
fails to acknowledge how women often use abortion as a tool against their
husbands or boyfriends. Thus, it seems that the pro-life movement is one based
on a selfish fear and self-preservation – fear of children, women or families
being abused, rather than a fearless heart of love which hates evil. It has a
fear of people and willingness to compromise with evil. No wonder it cannot
defeat the evil of abortion. By compromising with evil, one is indirectly
legitimising evil.
Professional pro-life
movement leaders are a problem
There are professional pro-life movement leaders who depend
on the movement for their living. Abolish
Human Abortion warns that: “There is so much that
could be said about the pernicious relationship between incremental
"abolition" and the funding of pro-life "ministries"...
Please do not be scammed by these people! Do not be fooled by the current
shifts in child killing taking place among the dark powers and principalities
in high places and think that it has something to do with the money you sent
some pro-lifer somewhere. Please do not be fooled by the triumphal and
selective rhetoric being employed by these shysters. They don't send out emails
announcing the opening of new state-of-the-art abortion mega-centers or the
fact that you can now buy abortifacients from the same place you get your
groceries, after all. And do not be deceived into thinking that the culture is becoming
more opposed to abortion or that the shutting down of surgical abortion clinics
entails a decrease in the number of image bearers being destroyed by
technologically advanced forms of child sacrifice.”
Indeed,
the pro-life movement spends much effort setting up crisis pregnancy centres
which focus on telling women to make the “good choice”, as opposed to the
abortion clinics which tell women to make the “bad choice”. Both of them, in
effect, fail to challenge the roots of abortion. The crisis pregnancy centres
only teach women to keep the child which is not a challenge to the child
sacrifice industry, but indirectly, an affirmation. It affirms it because it
does not directly challenge the culture which enables child sacrifice to
thrive.
Crisis
pregnancy centres and other pro-life organisations devoted to the cause for a
living have no real true incentive to abolish abortion. The crisis pregnancies
provide them with jobs. This is not to say that all pro-life fighters are
fighting abortion for money. Rather, it is to explain that because their living
depends on it, they must somehow find a way to continue in or extend the cause.
They often do so by raising new issues so that they can find more related jobs
or keep their jobs. When a person is enslaved by a desire for their own
material needs, they will place these needs first above all. They will serve
these needs first before those of others. When they make a living of a
particular cause, they will seek to perpetuate the cause to serve their own
needs. The pro-life movement is no different.
Many
of the non-government organisations are really not so innocent. Most have an
evil agenda behind them. However, even the ones of a worthy cause can become
worthless where the person’s motivation for becoming involved is not one of
selfless love, but out of selfish love – one which allows competing personal
interests to dominate. Indeed, no one can serve mammon and others. A person
either loves mammon or truly loves selflessly.
Pro-lifery
as a fashionable fad
There
is no doubt that child sacrifice is a grave evil. However, all one’s works in
fighting it is worth nothing if it is not done out of selfless love; love which
seeks not its own way, kind, good, patient, humble, keeps no record of wrongs,
and rejoices in the truth. Love is sacrifice. The greater the sacrifice, the
greater the love.
By
no means is this is to discredit the pro-life movement. Rather, it is a call to
examine one’s motives in all that one does. The sole focus of the pro-life
movement is increasing becoming the health of women, babies and families.
However, anyone who is concerned about their own health can do that. What shall
it profit a person if he cares only about his own health? There is no profit.
All his or her good works count for nothing.
The
pro-life movement is largely based on concern for human health, rather than child
sacrifice as an evil. Although many in the pro-life movement may truly abhor
child sacrifice, what is the proof? Words without deeds are worthless. What
matters is whether one has good deeds for deeds are the indicator of the true
state of one’s heart.
The
greatest indicator that a movement has become a fad is when people can earn
both a great reputation in the eyes of others, and a living from the cause. Such
a movement cannot be abolitionist because an abolitionist is he who is moved by
selfless love and a hatred for evil alone. He or she is not motivated by
profit, political stability, a good life, earning a living or a good
reputation. He is motivated purely by selfless love which casts out all fear and
anxieties.
Humanism
in the Pro-life Movement
Many
associate humanism with the liberalistic side of politics. However, this is far
from the truth. The pro-life movement employs humanistic philosophies in its
quest. Even the noble goal of saving lives is of humanism, because it sees human
life as its absolute ends, out of a selfish sense of fear. It goal is
ultimately a selfish one, because it does not seek to please God or can it seek
to please God. It is selfish, no matter what its motives are. The good works of
the unrighteous are like filthy rags (Isaiah 64:6).
Humanism seeks human interests as that which
it should aim for. While some of its goals may be good, such as improving human
health, its thinking is entrenched in human nature, that which is selfish,
hateful, and unforgiving. It has no love.
What is love?
Love
is selfless, and willingly sacrifices its own interests, aspirations and
visions. It sacrifices everything. It seeks not crave for material lusts,
sexual lusts, bloodlusts or any lusts. It hates lusts. It is also merciful and
forgiving. It seeks truth and rejoices in it. It does not use truth against
others to manipulate for its own ends, but uses truth to serve justice. Love is
sacrifice. There is no greater love than he who lays down his life for his
friends.
The
greatest love this world can ever know is that while all have hated God and grievously
broken God’s infinitely Holy and Just Moral Law, God became a man, Jesus
Christ, to take the just punishment for the sins of humanity on Himself. This
was so that all people can be redeemed from the just punishment of sins,
eternity in Hell. God gave His only begotten Son so that whosoever shall
believe on Him shall not have to face eternal damnation, but have the free gift
of Everlasting Life.
The
human heart is desperately wicked and deceitful above all things. It lies to
the person, making them think that actions which they know to be evil are
justified. The human heart is cannot change, but is enslaved to wickedness and
deceitfulness, and is wicked and deceitfulness itself.
The
heart of the matter is the matter of the heart. The heart of a person must
change. Without a change of the heart, nothing will change.
Child
sacrifice is a sin and must be abolish because
it offends God, not because it “hurts” people, breaks down human relations,
or offends people.
The
church must realise that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is the answer. All Christians must stop the fighting among themselves and
unite to fight works of darkness. The world is darkness and cannot be even be
trusted when it may express scepticism against abortion on moral grounds. It
has no credibility!
We
can no longer let the blood of the unborn cry out for justice. We must seek
justice on their behalf. We must fight for the souls of the murderers,
adulterers, and fornicators involved in abortion to be redeemed.
Comments
Post a Comment