Thursday, 15 January 2015
The Real Face of Feminism and its Deceptively Evil Subversiveness
A Modern Ideology?
Many think that feminism is a modern, progressive ideology, only able to be appreciated by the sophisticated secular woman, and never able to be accepted by the ‘naive, religious woman’ too weak to even stand up for herself. However, the spirit of feminism has been around since the Garden of Eden when Eve gave the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil to her husband Adam. Feminism is a subversion spirit that satan uses to make woman turn against man, despise his authority, and ultimately, make her think that God “subordinates” her by subjecting her to ‘oppression’ by virtue of her role as a helper.
Feminism is satan’s tool against woman, not out of love, but out of hate. He seeks to malign her view of God, hate man, that is, male persons, and despise his God-given authority so as to show contempt to God’s order of Creation. The spirit of feminism is against God’s order of Creation for male and female distinctions by virtue of roles, but not dignity or value, not because God made woman to be lesser in dignity or value, but because God made woman the same in value and dignity. As such, feminism legitimises the dissolution of God-given gender roles and embraces homosexuality and lesbianism.
The spirit of feminism’s lust for power and domination
The woman under the spirit of feminism wants to have power and authority over men; she wants to be higher in value and dignity as the spirit of feminism blinds her into thinking that by being gentle and quiet in spirit towards man, she is being “oppressed”. She is blinded to the spirit of feminism in her own rebellion against God through pride, anger, hate and jealousy. She loves to dominate, intimidate and manipulate because she is proud, full of self-centred wrath, hate and jealousy. The mere term ‘submission’ is a foul, even ‘blasphemous’ word to her. There is nothing she hates more than the godly woman whose life proves to her that Biblical submission is wholesome, wise and good.
‘Submission’ in the Bible means to be loyal, gentle, cooperative and helpful towards another. It does not mean to allow oneself to be manipulated, dominated or intimated. However, women under the spirit of feminism fail to see this, even when one gently explains to her what the Biblical definition of submission means. Such is the narrow-heartedness and vitriol of the feminist spirit. She does not even want to hear anything that even slightly contradicts her own view of how she should be treated or how she is being treated. She is unforgiving, vengeful and full of hate.
The feminist is typically a woman has much bitterness against men, and also women who have a different view about womanhood, in particular, the godly woman. She is often, I suspect, a woman who has been mistreated or misunderstood by a man in a relationship who either was mean to her, or failed to meet her expectations of him. As such, she is then disappointed, saddened and angered by a past relationship with a man. She allows this anger to be stored up in her, which then turns into bitterness and unforgiveness.
Many within the western church, both godly men and women, have fallen into the trap of thinking that the man is to blamed for a woman who is full of bitterness and unforgiveness, enabling her to be seduced by the spirit of feminism. This is a doctrine of demons which fuels blame, that which the spirit of feminism thrives upon. As such, the modern church is plagued by the spirit of feminism. Feminism is a doctrine of demons that manifests itself under the guise of ‘respect for women’ as though respecting women makes one such a righteous person. Even sinners find it easy to respect others, as long as they are being treated how they want to be treated by others. Respect is not rebuke people for their immorality and evil thinking.
For those who praise themselves for respecting women, I ask you, what about fear of God? Who is higher: God or people? God is Sovereign over all so His Word, no matter how hard it is to accept is to be taken as the Truth above what people in the church may say. Only God deserves praise and a high regard by others. Humans, including women, do not deserve any praise or any high regard.
Feminism’s deceptiveness and her guilt-mongering
The spirit of feminism loves to deceive others, through a false sense of guilt to create moral intimidation. Failing to praise or treat women in a special way, or criticising a woman who deserves rebuke is a cunning ploy that feminists pick up on to make people feel guilty about the “oppression” of women. Anyone who dares challenge this notion that to rebuke women or fail to praise women as a group is deemed “disrespectful” or “insensitive”, by failing to pander to their human sensitivities. How can a righteous and holy person pander to human sensitivities which come from the human heart which is desperately wicked and deceitful above all things? Pandering to human sensitivities would thus make one unrighteous, unholy, cowardly, and having a high view of humans, and thereby a low view of God.
Most women in the west are under the spirit of feminism. They deserve the harshest criticism and rebuke for their narcissism, selfishness, hate, pride, arrogance, envy, jealousy, deviousness, cunning, scheming hearts, adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, abortion, domination over husbands, abuse of children and love of divorce. They are immoral, and degenerate, capable of only fornication, pornography and adultery. It is because men have failed to rebuke and discipline women for their immorality that western society is degenerate, filthy and abominable. Feminism is one of the pillars of 21st century western civilisation. The 21st century west as a result, as turned into a moral cesspool and is deserves to be stripped of all its pride. It needs an extremely strong powerful dose of suffering, pain and oppression to even conceive of repenting of its manifold, abominable sins including the sin of feminism which is conniving, deceptive, and loves to blame others for its evils. Feminism has produced a generation of manipulative, conniving, cruel women who pretend to be victims when they are the victimiser, and pretend to be degraded by men when they degrade themselves through their sexual immorality.
Embracing and promoting the Rebellion of Witchcraft
The spirit of feminism loves to control other and despises higher authority. She pursues independence and will not submit to anyone – no husband, employer, government or any other rightful authority. She is powerful in all her pursuits of independence, and only a strong Bible-believing Christian who genuinely obeys God in His command for woman to submit to her husband can attack her evil authority-despising independence. Only a strong Bible-believing Christian who is fully submissive to God in this area of authority can challenge the spirit of feminism she is under. Otherwise, the spirit of feminism is too strong in her control over the women she has under her talons.
Owing to her love of control and hatred of authority, the spirit of feminism tend to wield her power most through academia, the media and the political arena. These are the three institutions that epitomise control, power and authority-despising independence. This is why they are appealing to feminists. The spirit behind the love of control and power is the spirit of witchcraft.
Witchcraft is not limited to the pagan rituals that worship fertility and death. Witchcraft is manifested through the love of control and power. Witchcraft feeds on the lust of the eyes through the appearance of independence and liberty from authority, the lust of the flesh through the ability to control one’s own life including reproduction and pride of life through a high-power, well-paid career which enables one to also enjoy earthly pleasures. It is no wonder the mantra of ‘having it all’ is so fitting with the feminist movement more than any other.
Feminine characteristics are deemed “oppressive”
The spirit of feminism reacts with utter disgust at the notion that women are by nature, nurturing, emotional and genteel. She knows too well of the natural design (or rather God’s design) of women, and that of men too. She hates man, and his authority. In despising his authority, she seeks for women to be un-nurturing, unemotional with a crass sense of indifference and bawdy. To embrace and live by these things is to be liberated. To even consider the qualities of being nurturing, emotional and genteel is to be enslaved and oppressed. Ironically, the characteristics that feminists aspire all women to have, have enslaved women in seeking to be un-nurturing, unemotional and bawdy. Since the 1960’s, women have been less happy, less satisfied with themselves and more depressed than women in the previous generations that embraced the natural characteristics she possesses that God has given to her as gift and a blessing.
The feminist who is so enslaved and seduced by the spirit of feminism seeks only to be one who can do what a man in his natural God-given characteristics can do to prove herself worthy. She not only cares not for the God who gave her gifts that she hates, but she seeks to dispose them as worthless, unless they can be used for her manipulative pursuit of sexual pleasures. She uses her gifts, or approves of using feminine qualities to seduce men or manipulates men who she perceives to be her perpetual enemy by virtue of his sex.
The feminist is a harlot and the whore of Babylon is her mother
She believes that the only legitimate role for woman is anything, but to serve in the home because such makes her “domesticated” instead of “free”, or a pornography performer because instead of being a seducer, she is being seduced sexually, therefore degraded or abused. Only when the woman is the seducer is she empowered, free and independent. Only when the woman is the seducer, and not the seduced, in pornography is it acceptable to the feminist. Since most pornography tends to depict the woman as seduced, the feminist finds it repulsive. However, when the woman is the seducer, the feminist finds it inspirational. Such is the spirit of harlotry working through those women under the spirit of feminism, who strive after control, power and domination.
The feminist finds abortion repulsive when it is a girl to be aborted, solely on the grounds that she is a girl, or when the abortion is not the woman’s ‘choice’. Such is the case of the early feminists who opposed abortion because it ‘hurts’ women. That is the way these early feminists views abortion, not because they were kind, compassion and loving, but because they were not as foolish and dominated by the spirit of harlotry of 21st century feminists that they were willing to oppose abortion. Had they been so dominated by the spirit of harlotry as the 21st century feminists, they will be seduced and blinded the idea of sexual freedom. It must be emphasised that the early feminists opposed abortion for self-centred, self-loving reasons, and not out of genuine love for others. It was in their own evil self-interests for supporting the ‘sisterhood’ that they opposed abortion.
How times have changed. Since the sexual revolution, which the early feminists were not subjected to, the masses became blinded by the spirit of harlotry. Both men and women embraced the ethic of sexual licentiousness. Pornography, exposed dressing, abortion, and contraception were accepted. Contraception and abortion were not only requested, but demanded at whim. Now, in the 21st century, anyone who even questions abortion, contraception, and extramarital sexual relationships is mocked as naive, or patronisingly treated as immature. This is merely a splinter of evidence of how darkened are the minds of the masses, which is a result of wilful sexual immorality and encouraging others to engage in such vile deeds.
Feminists of the 21st century now harshly mock and slander those who even dare question abortion to be hate-filled, bigoted and arrogant. Such is the evil of feminists whose minds are darkened by the spirit of harlotry. The spirit of harlotry is one that not only blinds the person under it so that she seeks sexual immorality are morally permissible, but one which feeds on her pride, and selfish desire of gratifying herself such that she must go and seek people to commit fornication with. She is controlled by her lustful desire, and loves to be controlled by her desire to commit fornication and adultery with. She cannot spend a day without causing another to sin with her.
She is not only the Proverbs 7 woman, but also the whore of Babylon, with her utter contempt of those who do good for they that “forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them” (Proverbs 28:4). The Proverbs 7 woman forces the fool to indulge in sexual immorality with her flattering speech: With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him (Proverbs 7:21). She is satisfied only when she causes others to sin. “For she hath cast down many wounded: yea, many strong men have been slain by her. Her house is the way to hell, going down to the chambers of death” (Proverbs 7:26:27). The Bible explicitly refers to an adulterous woman, and not anyone else, indicating that the adulterous woman is a particular type of person to be avoided at all costs. She is not to be associated with.
The whore of Babylon is the Proverbs 7 woman among other things. However, the scope of immorality as described in Revelation 17-18 extends beyond that described in Proverbs 7. She is not satisfied until she forces others to sin (Revelation 17:2, 4) epitomised by the sin of fornication; full of abominations (Revelation 17:2); wilfully and actively seeking not only to blaspheme God, but cause others to blaspheme Him (Revelation 17:3); murderous, satisfied only when the blood of all the righteous is shed (Revelation 17:6); and, possesses all earthly, sensual and demonic wisdom (Revelation 17:9).
Such is the feminist who is pro-abortion when abortion is done for a woman’s “right” to murder an innocent child, treating “it” like a disposable thing. She is a hater of those who are upright, including those who are gentle and quiet in spirit, as well as those who reject or even merely question her earthly, sensual and demonic wisdom. She hates stay-at-home mothers, and woman who choose to care for others. The feminist tells herself “I sit as a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow”, just like the whore of Babylon who “how much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow” (Revelation 18:7).
She loves only evil, and since those who do keep the law, condemn the iniquitous, she hates those who follow the law of God. That is why she hates those who she perceives to stop her from indulging in her lusts, and since she sees her lusts as justified as she is blinded by the spirit of harlotry, she hates those who are opposed to abortion at worse, or treats those opposed to abortion as naive at best.
She loves to degrade her own body, and finds it not degrading, but empowering because she takes pleasure in degrading that of her victims – the men who she traps into her snare. Her power comes from illicit pleasure, and her pleasure comes from her seductive power. The harlot, called a ‘prostitute’ or ‘sex worker’ in liberalised world, is not a victim, including those in ‘human trafficking’ rings. They are victimisers. Yet, many Christians treat these harlots in ‘human trafficking’ rings as ‘victims’. They are not as they ultimately choose to commit fornication and adultery like the whore of Babylon in Revelation 17-18. The tears she shed are crocodile tears as she mocks the woman who serves others, “I am no widow and shall see no sorrow”.
The spirit of Babylon is behind feminism
The spirit of Babylon is behind the spirit of feminism. The spirit of Babylon is one of harlotry. It is one of haughtiness, and a hatred of servitude and humility. She mocks those who are humble, and pretends to show kindness to them by telling them how sad she thinks it is for a woman to serve others and to be kind to others. This explains why the feminist thinks it is especially sad for a woman to be opposed to abortion – because she is one does not know her “basic rights”.
The feminist has a twisted, deviant, debauched and degenerate mind. She is a particular kind of fool – a steadfast fool who is not only determined to disobey God actively, but to scorn and blaspheme God to lead more people away from Him. She is the fool in Psalm 14:1, the one who says “there is no God”, despite knowing that God exists and that He will hold her accountable for her actions. Such is the spirit of the anti-Christ which the feminist is under. Indeed, feminists are atheists. If one is not a true atheist, one cannot be a true feminist, although one may certainly be under the spirit of feminism. Such is the case with many women, even within the church, who become very upset whenever they are told to be submissive towards authority, or whenever they are told to submit to their husbands. They start to get stirred up and start crucifying people who affirm it Biblical teaching, just like how modern evangelicals crucify people who use the Law of God in evangelism and fail to meet their human-made rules about being “gentle”.
The spirit of feminism has crept right into the church, alongside with the spirit of mammon. She manifests in the acceptance of women who wear clothing that are immodest, and of women who reject the Biblical teaching on submission to the authority of the husband. I have indeed seen women at Christian campus ministries who wear clothing that exposes the breasts. It really angers me to see such inappropriate clothing. This deserves harsh rebuke and criticism and indeed, I have made such a rebuke, despite it being ignored.
This failure to address that immodest behaviour of women within the church is owing to the fear of being deemed “insensitive” towards women at best, and “misogynistic” at worst. The church must address such an issue to clear the Holy Temple of God of all evil. Insensitivity toward women should never be feared as seeking to a sensitive towards the feelings of others is to pander to the carnal human mind and heart. Why should anyone care about being insensitive to women? If she’s a woman being hurt, so what?
Gianna Jessen, a pro-life activist and professing Christian once told an audience at Cherish Life Queensland that much anger women feel in relationships is justified. Such anger is the anger of self-centredness that another does not meet one’s expectations. Self-centred anger is sin. Hence, Ephesians 4:13 tells us to “let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice”.
To even have expectations about how one should be treated epitomises pride. None of us even deserve to have life as life is gift from God, and what we have earned by sin is death in Hell. Our very life is a gift from God given by grace. Thus, none of us should even have expectations as to how we should be treated.
Jessen then proceeds to tell her audience how a woman should let a man serve her because otherwise he will ‘become mean’. Even if this to true, it is an evil thought to even think that one should be served because no one deserves to be served. To think that is to elevate one’s esteem above others that which God hates. Man was not made to “serve” woman, he was made to serve God. It is because women have sought to make men slaves for them that family disintegration occurs, and this disintegration leads to social problems. Indeed, women are responsible indirectly for many social problems in the world such as dysfunctional children, abortion and unruly, wayward children. They seek to eject men from the family, raise a generation of dysfunctional children as a result of having no father, and yet blame men for all social ills.
Such is typical of the modern western woman – she is degenerate, abominable, evil, wicked, conniving, manipulative, domineering, slanderous, murderous, aggressive, superficial, sycophantic when seeking to gain sympathy and deserving only of wrath and, not to say, abusive. She is judgmental, a know-it-all, hateful, intolerant of those who non-feminist views and self-entitled. She thinks it justified for women to be sexually immoral, but yet that men who do these things are immoral and abusive towards her.
It must also be noted that societies that are the most feminised are the most evil, degenerate, sin-sick, sin-loving societies in history. They call themselves ‘progressive’ being under the Luciferian spirit which strives to question everything that is God-given or God-ordained. It is no wonder that sexual immorality is deemed progressive, and is rampant in feminised societies. Feminised societies, that is, societies influenced or dominated by feminism celebrate sexual immorality because of its perceived liberation of women. Interesting, some feminists, including ‘liberal’ feminists, object to such an argument, claiming that sexualised societies turn women into sex objects, and therefore that sexualisation does not liberate women, but forces them into being sex objects. However, this is not the issue, nor that which makes sexualisation of society morally wrong.
(Conditional) Sexualisation of society is a feminist aspiration
What makes sexualisation of society wrong is, first, that is offends God, and second, that it twists sex into a tool for gratifying oneself. The degradation of oneself by participation in sexual immorality is enjoyed by the individual because of one’s hostility to God. The body God has given each person to glorify Him, and so to use it in a way to gratify one’s pleasure is to violate its purpose. Violation of its purpose is to debauch and degrade the body because the dignity of each body is made to glorify God, and thus, doing to opposite is to strip its dignity.
The notion of bodily autonomy is one that feminists are united in striving for. They absolutely oppose anything that violates this tenet of bodily autonomy. The mantra they repeat like a drunken sailor is “I can do what my body”. That raises the question, ‘Can one use one’s body to kill others, commit paedophilia or bestiality?’ Whether these things are justified is a question that one must pose to those proponents of ‘bodily autonomy’. Feminists, in their pretence of possessing basic moral standards claim that they are opposed to paedophilia and child abuse. Why do they then say they support ‘bodily autonomy’? The rhetoric of ‘bodily autonomy’ is to silence those who oppose abortion, an issue that the feminists and the feminist media, not the ‘religious people’ have made a scandal out of.
Feminists, however, in their utter perversion, ask about maintaining dignity while seeking to still legitimise fornication and sexual immorality for women. What could be more deceptively evil and subversive than this? The quest for maintain bodily dignity while finding liberty to indulge in sexual immorality is to subvert the God-given purpose of the body for another one. To subvert the God-given purpose of the body is not only to show hostility against God, but to judge God and His purpose. Feminists think they have succeeded in this quest by changing what bodily dignity, and sexual immorality means socially and culturally. Bodily dignity now means the ability to degrade someone else’s body, as long as it is consensual. Sexual immorality is not something that exists, unless of course, it takes away the “right” of a woman to degrade someone else’s body. An act is only sexually immoral, if morality is even regarded by feminism, where there is no consent. Such is a doctrine of demons!
Feminists whine about the sexualisation of society when it hurts women, and feel extremely offended at pornography because it “upsets” them, not because it is sexually immoral per se. Yet, they seek to impose their ‘conditional ethic of sexual license’ on society, which ironically advocates the sexualisation of women through sexual license. To commit fornication and sexual immorality is to debauch one’s body and make oneself one’s own sex object. It is also to debauch another’s body and make others sex objects, but of course, the feminist in her love for power and controls strives to make only men the sex objects of women when this is impossible – when one seeks to degrade others through sexual immorality, one debauches one’s own body. Such is the hypocrisy of the feminists who seek to be treated with dignity and yet complain about not been able to act with indignity. To make matters worse, they love to blame others for their “inability” to act with such sexual immorality while boasting about their sexual immorality. This is clearly demonstrated by the feminist push for ‘consent’ laws which deem rape to have occurred even when a woman consents at the time with knowledge, but changes her mind after the sexual encounter, pornography laws which selectively criminalise some pornography, but legalise others such as that in raunchy movies, and of course, abortion law which make abortion legal only when the mother decides at her discretion so as to choose when she wants to murder her baby.
The pro-feminist media under the Luciferian spirit, which seeks to cast doubt as to whether abortion, which is clearly murder, is an evil act, a sin. The questioning of that which all people know to be a sin as a result of God writing His Laws on the hearts of every person is of the Luciferian spirit. The Luciferian spirit seeks to question and challenge all of God’s Laws, Commandments, orders and ways. It does this to ultimately challenge God’s authority because it is anti-Christ.
The spirit of feminism despises children
The spirit of feminism not only hates men; she hates children, perhaps even more than she hates men, with a thirst for blood. Indeed, ancient witchcraft religions involving worship of a (false) goddess of fertility were complimented by a (false) god of child sacrifice, such as Asherah and Molech.
She perceives children as a perverse and evil reminder of her fertility and her responsibilities as a mother; that which she despises with a blood-thirst for killing both the child and in many cases, the father. This only reflects how perverse and evil the feminist is. She loves her fertility as a tool to use against framing men in sex scandals, and in enslaving them to pay finances for to look after children, only to divorce and commit adultery with another man. On the other hand, she hates her fertility because she hates children. Yet, feminists claim they hate the church because of child abuse? Is abortion not worse, but it cold-heartedly, callously, arrogantly takes away a life, for convenience under the guise of “maternal health”.
Feminists use children as a propaganda tool to advance their agenda of hate against their enemies. They are the ones who have been responsible for making children an object for exploitation through cunning propaganda – they complain about child pornography, but yet open advocate child murder. Such are the ways of those full of hate. He that hateth dissembleth with his lips, and layeth up deceit within him (Proverbs 26:24). Those who live on deceit can only be double-minded and unstable. They have no integrity, and any integrity of theirs is hypocrisy. James 1:5-8 says: “If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you. But when you ask, you must believe and not doubt, because the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That person should not expect to receive anything from the Lord. Such a person is double-minded and unstable in all they do.” Those who are filled with hypocrisy and thus have no integrity like the feminists are fools, double minded-and unstable in all they do.
The feminist objects to no-fault divorce only, of course, on the grounds that it allows her male ‘partner’ to leave her whenever he wants, making her feel “offended” as though a person’s feelings of being offended matter. To the unregenerate, Hell-deserving, Hell-bound person, she thinks that whatever “offends” her personally is morally wrong, such as the feminist. She would support no-fault divorce for allowing women to enjoy a ‘satisfying’ relationship. Such is the perversity of these feminist witches whose mere presence is the way to Hell. They are witches because they are under the spirit of witchcraft which is the spirit of rebellion, opposed to all loyalty, gentleness, kindness and innocence.
The spirit of witchcraft which is behind the spirit of feminism hates children because they represent innocence. A feminist woman may seem kind to children, however, she is not, nor can she. She is an unregenerate witch who advocates abortion, supports no-fault divorce as a tool for her to manipulate men, and loves children, that is, to manipulate them and use them against fathers. She is proud of being a witch and knows she is a witch.
She is not to be trusted and the most dangerous type of person of all. She seems sweet, but it full of murder in her heart. She is far, far, more dangerous than an Islamic terrorist who beheads people to scare the west. At least the dark deeds of the Islamic terrorists can be seen very clearly and are known to all. The feminist is the Proverbs 7 woman who leads people to Hell. The Islamic terrorist as least does not lead people to Hell with his sweet words. All he does is kills the body. Jesus said ‘fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him (Father God) who is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell’ (Matthew 10:28). Therefore, it is not the murderous people who should be feared, but those who are a threat to the soul such as the adulterous woman of any kind.
She seems sweet, like the children she pretends to love, but loves them only as objects to be manipulated.
The domination of the spirit of mammon
The spirit of feminism works together with the spirit of mammon to make women feel enslaved with the desire for power through work, and also the desire to be cared for. The ‘second-wave feminists’ criticised careerism, claiming that it was oppressive for women, forcing them to work out of a need to show oneself worthy. The ‘third-wave feminists’ however, embraced careerism, claiming that is ‘empowers’ women by placing them in a position to compete with men financially. What they call the need to compete is that which causes division between men and women. Division is a sin of the flesh. Division in this sense is carnal. For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? (1 Corinthians 3:3).
It must be noted how people in general seek ‘equality’ in finance through divisions. Finance is what drives the world to fight. It is concerned with how much one has materially. Finance is the main driving force behind nearly all wars. Wars, because they facilitate division between people are tool used to finance other nations, almost always, if not always, through debt. Debt is used to finance wars. Wars feed the debt.
The world thrives on division because of the lust of the eye and lust of the flesh which both feed the pride of life. Both the lust of the eye and lust of the flesh leads to such division, and such division which feed on the pride of life, fuels even more lust of the eye and lust of the flesh. Division puffs up pride. Such pride feeds on the lust of the eyes and flesh which become insatiable as a result. Hell and destruction are never full; so the eyes of man are never satisfied (Proverbs 27:20). Therefore, division which comes from lust of the eyes, are never ceased.
The Luciferian spirit behind it all
When satan tempted Eve to sin by asking “did God really say...”, he was not only tempting her to question God’s authority, but to tempt her to not trust God’s command that Adam and Eve could any fruit except for that from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Satan sows seeds of doubt in God’s Word, to make people who are spiritually dead regard God’s Word as that which cannot be trusted, or that which should be questioned. To even question God is sin and, it is the mere questioning and doubting of God’s authority which led to sin entering the world (Romans 5:12). Eve doubted God’s command which led her to sin. Questioning the authority of God’s word is of the anti-Christ.
The spirit of the anti-Christ blinds the unbelieving. Without the light of Jesus in whom there is no darkness, one not only cannot see truth, but one does not even have the ability to seek after truth of which there is only one truth. Jesus said, “I am THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Jesus is THE truth. Not only in Him is there truth, but He is THE answer to questions of truth. Jesus created the universe. Jesus is the only standard for right and wrong. Jesus is the only way to find forgiveness of sins and liberation from guilt. Jesus is the only one in whom one can find life. Without Jesus, there is no truth, no forgiveness of sins, liberation from guilty, no life, but only darkness, sin, guilt and death.
No matter how much one has sinned against God, God sent His Only begotten Son to die for the sins of the world so that whosoever repents and puts one’s faith in Jesus Christ shall not perish, but find Everlasting Life (John 3:16).
Jesus commands all to repent, and put their faith in Him today.