To those of you who have not read Big Porn Inc, let me tell
you one thing. Remember who it is written by: vitriolic, man-hating feminists who
are only satisfied to see how men are represented as buffoons, beaten by women,
emasculated and feminised. The men they love are those who fear them because
they are not assertive, mature or strong enough to stand up against their
female dominance those feminists live to aspire for. They like this type
because they get to be the dominant one. They reject the God-given role to man
ā to lead, protect and support oneās family and community. Itās a simple as
that. They are the same as the feminists
in 1960s Australia who sought to exclude the Aborigines to whom they thought
they were āsuperiorā to. To those who have read it, while I do not support
pornography at all, flush the book out of your system. To those who read it without
a feeling of cynicism as you read it, I fear for you, that is, unless of
course, you yourself are a bigoted, racist, sexist feminist. If you are a
bigoted, racist, sexist feminist, face this: no man should respect you. You do
not deserve respect from anyone because you are serving your own cunning
political and personal interests.
The (Mock) Preface
We live in the new world: a pornified world. No other time
in history have people (especially women) become so sexualised. While women are
thankfully, gaining more freedom and choice in the modern world to do
absolutely anything they choose, women are becoming increasingly depressed,
less content with themselves and more suicidal. While we think that this because
of apathy, indifference, and greed on part of society as a whole, we acknowledge
that where women are sexualised and involved in pornography and prostitution,
it is indicates that men are inherently the culprits. There is no āother sideā
to this argument. A woman, who is not bombarded with such images, would never
sexualise herself, even if she thinks it makes her attractive. This is because
women are too sensible and good to even sexualise themselves. We expose the
patriarchal society, as a patriarchal society is one that is decadent,
capitalist and, hence redundant. A matriarchal society, where women lead is the
only one that will work ā children will be adequately taken care of and women
get to enjoy their own rights to leisure, fun and good living. Men, in a
matriarchal society, deserve what they get: continuous punishment for the
production of children who women do not want. We are finally seeking progress
in womenās rights: many countries have now legalised abortion ā a means of
allowing women, and men too, to have the freedom to choose and rearrange their
families.
We fully support the rights of women to engage in any type
of sexual relations as long as it is the woman who controls the relationship. We
support pornography that involves a woman enjoying the sex and even controlling
a man. But because pornography always involves a woman who is not in control,
it is wrong. Pornography is not only sexist, but racist. White men are the ones
who control pornography, explaining the lack of diversity of those bosses of
the global pornography ring. Although
there are others who are big bosses in the industry, the dominant group is
still the white man. Hence, by supporting, or even by mere talking about it and
failing to burn all pornography in town, you are supporting these white men who
are part of a bygone era.
Melinda Tankard Reist, the queen of the anti-pornography
crusaders who behead any man who even doubts her approach and her character, is
the true feminist heroine. She fights all pornography as pornography is violence against women. It does not
merely incite violence against women ā it is violence. She has the guts of a
man to question why boys are not objectified by pornography. She once valiantly
destroyed Operation
Cockstorm on Australiaās Q&A by exposing it. Although there are men who are used to perform
sex acts for money, they are gay. Gay men are the same as women because they
are feminised ā that is, trapped in a Victorian Era of heterosexism and rigid
social mores. Gay men have been labelled homosexuals by homophobic men, because
these homophobic (white) men fear that they have more pleasure than them. It is
time gay men step up in the fight against pornography which is homophobic,
sexist and racist. Should pornography be legitimate, it should involve people
freely engaging in sex on equal terms. Equal means equal capacity to control
and hold the power. However, this is never possible for women in sex. With
pornography, women can never control men and society would be out of control.
Pornography is not progressive; it is regressive because it gives (white) men
the power to control the world and to make society more capitalist. A
capitalist world is one where women slave at the hands of these men who should
rightly be redundant.
We live in a pornified world which is both liberating and
enslaving at the same time. It is liberating because it breaks all sexual
mores. On the other hand, it is enslaving as we women do not lead men in
pornography. That is to say, we are not able to fill our full sexual potential.
While some think pornography itself is āimmoralā in itself, we disagree. It is
wrong and unethical only because it is sexist and racist. We believe that if
only pornography can empower women, it would be much less worse or even be potentially
beneficial for society as only women exercise a care ethic that men do not.
In the mission to fight pornography, we would like to make
one thing clear: it cannot be left to fundamentalist Christians to āmoraliseā
society on their terms. There are two reasons. Firstly, it would lead to a
dictatorship that is so antithetical to progress that we all like to see. Secondly and perhaps more importantly, it is
patriarchal. It supports the status quo of men leading, protecting and
supporting their families and community. It would seek to banish women from all
areas of life whether it is education, politics, government, entertainment and
even, the family where it thinks women are the most well-fitted and capable of
handling. Despite women having a significant role from the Christian
perspective, it has failed to teach women to fight for their rights, whether it
be to fight for the right to attend wild
parties, drink as they please, dress up
in any way they want and to be sexually aggressive. By placing men as leaders,
it has taught men to be sexually aggressive and fight for their rights to do
absolutely anything they want, including the ārightā to dislike a woman just
for being āsexually inappropriateā, ārudeā or ābossyā. Nina Funnell, had an
article published at Mama Mia, an Australian feminist news outlet about the homophobic
sexist āadviceā given by a Christian ministry to a school about sexual ethics (or morals, to use their fundamentalist
bigoted term). (If you support religion, I suggest you run away from Nina and
her feminist ilk who will devour you.) We strongly recommend you read it to
understand how dangerous the fundamental Christian right is.
It was a journey writing this book together. We have cried
together, swore together and laughed together (mainly at those perverts and
Christians at their ridiculous nonsensical arguments). Letās keep up the fight,
Comrades! And overthrow the patriarchal Judeo-Christian structure of our
society!
Comments
Post a Comment