We live in an age of postmodernism where what is right or
wrong is a matter of what the individual believes. The sexual liberation
movement is the most obvious manifestation of postmodernism. Sexual liberalism
is a seductive one as it promises people that they can fornicate with each
other without any consequences, whether they are social, cultural, physical,
emotion or moral consequences. It has promised people that no longer do they
need to cooperate with their spouse in their sexual relationship, but they can
now use their spouse to serve only their sexual expectations, and that when
they are no longer “satisfying”, they can discard them like a plastic wrapping
that protects goods while being shipped to its owner. Owing to their inability
to respect the human dignity of others, while at the same time desiring respect
from others, people have sought to eliminate the physical consequences of
fornication through birth control, including abortion which is the ultimate
form of selfishness that dares to excuse the sacrifice of the life of another,
only to suit the sexual gratification of oneself.
I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and
wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well (Psalm 139:14).
Abortion supporters often equate abortion opponents or
pro-lifers to be backwards, or denigrate pro-lifers as “old men” who seek to “control”
a woman’s “right to choose”. They even audacious enough to assume moral
superiority over pro-lifers by berating them as people who seek to single out
women for responsibility of abortion. They howl with false anguish for these “victims”
who end up “having to” kill their baby. While many of them may have been
encouraged by a boyfriend to procure an abortion, any person who intentionally
seeks an abortion is already morally guilty by that intention alone. Women who
claim that it is their right to choose to kill their child, while claiming that
child abuse is wrong are extremely hypocritical. They take pride in lambasting
those men who seek to use them for their own sexual means, while boasting about
how liberated they are because they can fornicate without social criticism and
then murder their baby whenever they choose to. Such women are wicked, evil,
deceptive, manipulative and perverse, all while pretending to be victims of the
ones who they are in a sexual relationship with. If one has no moral values
oneself, one has no right to even think about the morality of the actions of
others.
On the other hand, the arguments against abortion are that
which do not regard the killing of an innocent child itself. Instead, they
falsely claim that the woman who procures abortions is innocent because she
will suffer emotion and psychological damage as a result of the abortion. Such
is guilt, and one should feel guilt to committing an evil act. To console a
woman who feels guilt from having an abortion to like consoling a man who
murders a woman for the guilt he feels after he has been sentenced to life
imprisonment. It is true that whoever tries to encourage another to have an
abortion is guilty of murder in their heart, but this does not negate the moral
responsibility of the woman who intentionally murders her baby. Abortion is the
murder of a child in the womb, and there can be no argument against this. Murder
is inherently wrong in the absolute sense. Why should the murder of a child
under the deceptive guise of “convenience” be excused? What could possibly justify the murder of an
innocent child? Of course, the abortion supporters would dismiss this as simply
sympathy for a baby for being a baby.
The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The
son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear
the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him,
and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him (Ezekiel 18:20).
Many ask what if the baby killer of a woman was raped. While
it is absolute tragic for that to happen to anyone, the rape is an incident
that is separate from the murder of a baby. The rapist has committed one crime;
the one who procures an abortion has committed another heinous crime. Therefore,
to argue that a woman is entitled to abort her child because it was conceived
in rape is not merely misguided; it is to blame the baby for the crime of the
father. Why should a baby conceived in rape pay in blood for the crimes of the
father? Why? This is extremely obvious when one actually thinks about the crime
of the mother herself. Thus, it can be concluded that the real reason why
people use this argument to invoke sympathy is because they are ultimately trying
to justify sexual liberalism for themselves.
It is the act of abortion itself that is evil for what it
is. Therefore, the consequences of abortion on the woman who had the abortion
are completely irrelevant as to its wrongness. As long as the pro-life movement
falsely paints the woman as a victim, it undermines the moral purpose of
fighting abortion – to fight evil. This is analogous to saying that one must
help the paedophile from raping children by showing him sympathy because he is
trying to stop his desires but he cannot. No! The woman who intentionally seeks
abortion is a cruel, evil, heartless woman. Such sympathy shown towards such
women is not only naive, but false misguided sympathy that looks only at the
circumstances rather that the heart. As such, it is incapable of reaching the
heart of the matter. The heart of the matter is a matter of the heart: pure selfishness
from the human heart.
The
work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness,
and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another (Romans 2:15).
The minds of abortion supporters who accuse pro-lifers of
being immoral are utterly depraved. They do know that abortion is wrong,
however, because of their perverse minds, they idolise the new god of
convenience and sexual “freedom” and become blind to the abomination of
abortion. Sexual liberalism is their religion and anything that is good and
shines truth on their evil acts is offensive to them. This explains all the
attacks against the pro-lifers.
No wonder modern society is so depraved and blind towards
what is right and what is wrong. Society can only blame itself.
Comments
Post a Comment